Apt, I fully agree. Who’s running this show? Get a better understanding of monetary flow and how people maneuver their confidence. I can’t vote for a subjective and poorly derived/ allocated proposal. Please re-review.
I wouldn’t be interested in putting my monies into any of these proposed ‘derivitives.’ I don’t find the proposal clear, concise and, especially, not strategic. In about 2 minutes, APT—the commenter—provided more clarity and strategy than the proposal did in its voluminous refuse. So, what ever inexperienced person or lazy experienced person is leading this proposal, perhaps step aside and let some eager thinkers and strategists have a proper go. Hope this criticism propels in any capacity.