# An Alternate View on the Future of Algorand xGov

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/an-alternate-view-on-the-future-of-algorand-xgov/12077>\
**Category:** Governance Discussions\
**Created:** [June 3, 2024, 7:32pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/an-alternate-view-on-the-future-of-algorand-xgov/12077 "2024-06-03T19:32:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ALGOnumberone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a6a055/32.png) [@ALGOnumberone](https://forum.algorand.co/u/ALGOnumberone)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2024, 8:48pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/an-alternate-view-on-the-future-of-algorand-xgov/12077/7 "2024-06-12T20:48:36Z")

</div>

I just don’t see a way to vet proposals without a more efficient central oversight like a council though. How would this proceed to ding them individually? Part of my reason to bring in these institutions and more centralisation is for them to possibly offer the traditional resources that have been proven to work for governance/effective treasury mgmt.

I agree xGov program, if ever desired, should push these incrementally and gently but in all honesty the proposed structuring is nothing burdensome for what the incentives the recipients have been getting so far, and not so much in return for the ecosystem/Foundation.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/an-alternate-view-on-the-future-of-algorand-xgov/12077)._