OP (May 4)
It has been over two weeks since your latest email and the promise of commitment to addressing the concern. What’s the plan and ETA for the next step?
Algofi (May 8)
Are you open to drafting an alternative proposal using the alternative ideas you’ve posted on this thread? I think it’s important, in the interest of decentralization, to put the vote to the DAO.
OP (May 8)
I’ve done it once and it took me an unbelievable amount of time and effort. A few loud governors do not want to see any changes (even small) to STBL, and they claim you (the founders) don’t support such changes. To be fair to them the last proposal didn’t receive an explicit support from the founders under the discussion thread, and when I referred to the communication emails, one governor called me publicly a liar. If there was an explicit support from the beginning the latest proposal could have been approved.
At this point I think it is your responsibility to the Algofi users to communicate the proposal and make sure it gets done appropriately and ASAP.
So far there are two concrete proposals, the one that was submitted (preferred) and the other one about limiting the STBL MC and making future changes subject to the governors approval. I will be happy to discuss them or other ideas here or under the proposal thread, however the driver of effort should be the Algofi team.
Algofi (May 10)
Ok, let me socialize this in the Discord in the coming days.
OP (May 10)
It sounds like a good plan. Looking forward to voting for a proposal that addresses the concern.