Also, when I criticized the simplicity of the scripts, you responded that the value was in “execution, consistency, maintenance” and yet you are not monitoring the service uptime.
That was from a retroactive perspective, and I personally, outside the scope of the proposal in a proactive manner, continued to meet those standards for several months. I have laid out plans in my previous comment to remedy my absence from twitter and how it affects observability of the AF Watcher account and its uptime:
“I actually planned on putting together a discord bot version of the watcher later today as a compromise so that we can have a dedicated channel to discuss its effectiveness and reach me directly, as well as a summary of any missed transaction notifications in the last 2 weeks or so.”
— admittedly, of course, it has not met the five 9’s of availability as of most recently due to previously mentioned server issues. A new discord bot does not mean we will be shutting down the twitter service, both would persist.
Is the Gainify code part of this proposal? If not, why should xGov pay “Retribution for weeks of unpaid work & maintenace” on that project?
Regarding your last statement here, we don’t mind sharing the codebase for the Gainify repository and can do that as well — we personally just look at it as taboo like everyone else, but if that interests you or anyone else it can be included. The logic is sound and functional after some important changes made.
I actually do agree that it is helpful to include if mentioning retribution / maintenance of that platform. I can amend this to the to be open-sourced manifest of the official proposal and update the parent comment here later this week*.