# Bridge to NEAR, DOT or ATOM?

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/bridge-to-near-dot-or-atom/7623>\
**Category:** General\
**Tags:** testnet, community, mainnet, developer, smart-contracts\
**Created:** [August 14, 2022, 2:06am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/bridge-to-near-dot-or-atom/7623 "2022-08-14T02:06:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Domenico](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8e7dd6/32.png) [@Domenico](https://forum.algorand.co/u/Domenico)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2022, 2:06am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/bridge-to-near-dot-or-atom/7623/1 "2022-08-14T02:06:39Z")

</div>

Is anyone working on a bridge to Near, Polkadot or Cosmos? would love to bridge those coins into Algo defi. I figure DOT would be a difficult one. Maybe build an ALGO parachain and then algo could bridge to that.

I think the ALGO parachain would be able to interoperate with the other parachains. Then again, I guess state proofs are coming, so maybe no need. what do i know. I am no developer. Haha

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/bridge-to-near-dot-or-atom/7623)._