Silent Rhetoric has demonstrated how easy it is to spam xGov proposals via github ( xGov-130 to xGov-139) : AlgoROSSA. Pull requests · algorandfoundation/xGov · GitHub I suggest a community review of all proposals by xGovs before voting starts. Voting period can be dived into two parts: Communit…

I disagree, it will create a very tribal environment where it turns into an all boys club. If this program is meant to be for “experts” to vote, then the “experts” should do proper due diligence before voting.

What about xGovs do the moderation and then it goes for voting.

While i disagree with Silent’s method (although i find it quite smart), i am against any sort of vetting process as i pointed it out in the past. I have no trust in any sort of appointed bodies to keep it objective and no’t have personal interests in mind - this premise is further solidified by defi…

Your not wrong but then who are these “experts”, what interest do they have? I believe there is already tribalism here even with minimal participation.

Gatekeeping is not something I recommend. Instead, a random proposal will go to a random xGov address for moderation. This is not possible in current workflow. But if we have a seperate app for xGov, this can be accomplished easily.

The “experts” was a mock on xgov standing for expert governors. The voting pattern from the first two periods has suggested everything other than expert.

Would it be possible to limit the amount of proposals one individual/team can get through each round? Would address the spamming as demonstrated by silent, but avoids appointing gatekeepers?

I am not sure if it is prudent to do a gate keeping. Spams can be removed before merging. It is upto xGovs to decide which one to vote and which one not to.

[image] LoafPickle: If this program is meant to be for “experts” to vote, then the “experts” should do proper due diligence before voting. I agree with this opinion. Its the fail of the proposed voting system that it cannot handle day to day decision making. AF should create or adopt the vot…

Community moderation for proposals before voting session: xGov

Governance Discussions

expertgovernor January 16, 2024, 6:25pm 8

I feel offended, considering my “expertise” as a governor.

Topic		Replies	Views
An Alternate View on the Future of Algorand xGov Governance Discussions	10	616	July 11, 2024
[xGov][Community meeting][New Version][2024/04/04] Governance Discussions arc34	57	2406	May 30, 2024
Feedback on the XGov Proposal Governance Discussions	10	1195	January 27, 2023
xGov Update and Community Input Required re First Voting Session xGov feedback , xgov	7	3050	August 31, 2023
Thoughts after attending Decipher's Governance Roundtable on xGovs & ARC-33 Proposal Governance Discussions	12	1106	December 26, 2022

Community moderation for proposals before voting session: xGov

Related topics