That’s an interesting idea.
I think even on automated scripts it’d be good practice to have it be well understood and consistent with any rate changes.
Like this thinking! Thank you!
@dashawn.algo - yeah 15 days could also work, I’m aware people wanted a decent amount of time given before changes were affected, hence the rolling month idea - but I’m not opposed to either.
Yes, contracts will be re-written and automation can come in, but this is still an important subject around how rate increases - and in a dynamic world, the base rate changes, are communicated.