# Consensus rewards whitepaper concern

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [January 30, 2024, 9:10pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259 "2024-01-30T21:10:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GhostOfMcAfee](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/ghostofmcafee/32/3235_2.png) [@GhostOfMcAfee](https://forum.algorand.co/u/GhostOfMcAfee)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2024, 6:40pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259/25 "2024-02-02T18:40:43Z")

</div>

> [@d3ath5t4r](#):
>
> 10mm min = 1000 max #of nodes

I don’t think a 10MM _minimum_ was suggested. The discussion was about a _maximum_ allowed in a node.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259)._
