# Consensus rewards whitepaper concern

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [January 30, 2024, 9:10pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259 "2024-01-30T21:10:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Titi](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/titi/32/3632_2.png) [@Titi](https://forum.algorand.co/u/Titi)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2024, 2:21am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259/4 "2024-02-02T02:21:44Z")

</div>

Yep I agree, cap at 10 million, minimum also should be lowered, hostile capture of upgrades spot on as well. Ideally, mining percentage should be dynamic wrt some parameters that can fluctuate with the balancing of the operational cost and algos online

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259)._