# Consensus rewards whitepaper concern

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [January 30, 2024, 9:10pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259 "2024-01-30T21:10:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 52

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnWoods](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/johnwoods/32/2361_2.png) [@JohnWoods](https://forum.algorand.co/u/JohnWoods)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2024, 11:59am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259/52 "2024-02-05T11:59:18Z")

</div>

P2P pooling would be executed using a smart contract paired with a managed node operator.

In that mode there would be no “minimum”, as the contract is essentially an aggregate account.

`>MaxCeiling` accounts will be permitted, but not paid over the threshold.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259)._