# Consensus rewards whitepaper concern

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [January 30, 2024, 9:10pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259 "2024-01-30T21:10:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 54

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnWoods](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/johnwoods/32/2361_2.png) [@JohnWoods](https://forum.algorand.co/u/JohnWoods)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2024, 12:05pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259/54 "2024-02-05T12:05:55Z")

</div>

> [@d3ath5t4r](#):
>
> - Three proposed multiplier shapes, linear, “S” shape, and parabolic. (Note: The “S” and parabolic shapes push the incentives away from the Network failure horizon)

Feel free to make a PR to the paper, then the technical team can review on GH.  
This forum isn’t great for technical discussion, and most of the team aren’t watching it.

Thanks for this analysis.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/consensus-rewards-whitepaper-concern/11259)._