I want to preface this with a few things: We’ve only seen the initial thoughts on consensus participation The people creating it are geniuses, I am most definitely not I’m just offering my opinions. Take them as that. There’s probably many mispellings and typos That said, I wanted to bring up a …

[image] d3ath5t4r: Three proposed multiplier shapes, linear, “S” shape, and parabolic. (Note: The “S” and parabolic shapes push the incentives away from the Network failure horizon) Feel free to make a PR to the paper, then the technical team can review on GH. This forum isn’t great for tec…

I would like to start by saying thank you for the amazing work your team is doing. Rome was not built in a day, but they were laying bricks every hour. Laying a brick every day, year after year is how you build an empire. Laying those bricks is how we build Algorand into an empire. I have a few fo…

[image] oysterpack: I would like to start by saying thank you for the amazing work your team is doing. Thank you my friend! We’re trying! [image] oysterpack: Will these node runner and consensus participation solutions be officially maintained and supported by the Algorand Foundation? A…

I was thinking along approach A but we don’t want to limit how much stake can go online. The network is most secure if all algos are online improbable but possible. If we go the Bitcoin way might lead to centralization if it gets harder to mine. I think we can base the fee adjustment on throughput(m…

Most Node Pool Operators operate across multiple chains and are knowledgeable enough to develop their own solutions…I’m all for open-source, but if there’s a monetary incentive for node-running, companies will fund their own development of such platforms imo…did the Bitcoin Foundation fund developme…

A 50m account suspended is a big deal for the network. Paying 2 algos out 50m is peanuts giving the responsibility they have. Charge .0001 of stake. This way we have no problem with funding node runners and people will be incentivized to make up for how much they lost. .0001 is 1 algos for 10k= .000…

I don’t see the need for the minimum we already maintain a map of online accounts currently in memory it didn’t affect anything. people are going to drop off themselves because they aren’t making money and spending too much maintaining a node. As more stake is online the less chance you get, indirec…

I don’t see the need for the minimum we already maintain a map of online accounts currently in memory it didn’t affect anything Can you point to where in the code this map can be used to non-manually mitigate absenteeism in the critical path? Have you considered consensus parameters? Do you unde…

Thanks for replying, my post is a mere suggestion I’m not ripping the incentive paper apart or saying we shouldn’t do incentives at all. I’ll get back to you on where I saw the map but it’s a suggestion. The idea was that if it’s already in the map it can be used for suspension also Actually these…

I was able to find the pieces of code that might be helpful and could be applied for suspended accounts if feasible. In the block there’s a list of proposed updates to expired online accounts as noted on line 139 - 148 in block.go under bookkeeper Also in ledger/eval.go the function generateExpired…

Consensus rewards whitepaper concern

General

PatrickB June 19, 2024, 8:10pm 70

Réti Pooling Overview | Réti Open Pooling describes it.

I’m leading a workshop about it at Decipher as well.

Topic		Replies	Views
GP8 Measures DRAFT DeFi Rewards Allocation Q4 Governance Measures gp8	74	4856	August 29, 2023
[Temperature Check] Reward node runners through governance Governance Discussions	18	2013	January 14, 2023
GP8 Measures DRAFT for Community Feedback Governance Measures gp8	42	5551	September 6, 2023
Idea for decentralization -- subscribe to participation nodes through wallet General	7	1453	August 29, 2021
Serious lack of transparency and engagement of Algorand foundation	29	9629	August 16, 2022

Consensus rewards whitepaper concern

Related topics