# Evolving Algorand Governance **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance Discussions\ **Tags:** defi\ **Created:** [May 3, 2022, 6:58pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646 "2022-05-03T18:58:49Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 18
**Author:** ![cooleydw494](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/cooleydw494/32/1855_2.png) [@cooleydw494](https://forum.algorand.co/u/cooleydw494)\ **Post date:** [May 3, 2022, 11:07pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646/18 "2022-05-03T23:07:39Z")
I think this is a great post and very well thought out. I’d point out that governance rewards will continue to decrease and that perhaps some changes could be made via proposals rather than a dismantling from the top down (although exchanges and Algorand Inc will decide right?). I don’t dislike the governance program and I think that some goals may not be the same for everyone, but to be honest I’m not knowledgeable enough to have an opinion on this. This sounds like a good idea, but Algorand governance also seems to have benefits to me. It does at the very least seem that the TVL argument is correct but I can’t synthesize that into a particularly strong opinion. In any case, just some thoughts. I appreciate the post and think this is an important discussion as somebody who wants Algorand to achieve the success it deserves. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646)._