# Evolving Algorand Governance

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646>\
**Category:** Governance Discussions\
**Tags:** defi\
**Created:** [May 3, 2022, 6:58pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646 "2022-05-03T18:58:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 185

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![defidaddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e68b1a/32.png) [@defidaddy](https://forum.algorand.co/u/defidaddy)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2022, 2:24am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646/185 "2022-05-31T02:24:15Z")

</div>

Or we could stop wasting time pursuing this half baked idea and lay down good measures. No offense but this idea was bad to begin with and is only getting worse.

The foundation now doesn’t want to step on toes or look bad making a last minute change but I think myself and the majority see the foundation still supporting this measure and are for the first time questioning judgement. Not a good look.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646)._