I can only agree with the suggestion of supporting proposals with more math… The original purpose was not changing the definition of citizens or of security, but including in governance new citizens that already exist, and rewarding them for their commitment. Citizens in DeFi run risks that can involve other assets in DEX or lending Algos (rather than selling) to borrow other assets, and they can have also have losses that are not related to any lack of commitment. With a bit more math, we can take this into account without breaching the really fundamental principles. Thanks for your contribution!
Massimo
218
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feedback requested on proposed Q3 2022 Governance Measures | 205 | 14005 | January 8, 2023 | |
| Governance Period 6 Draft Measures - Community Check In | 65 | 5677 | May 17, 2023 | |
| Counterproposal for Q3 2022 Governance Measures | 0 | 800 | August 22, 2022 | |
| Lowering Goverance rewards to fund communtity voted projects | 7 | 611 | May 17, 2024 | |
| Feedback request on proposed Q4 2022 governance measures | 161 | 11956 | June 6, 2023 |