# Evolving Algorand Governance

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646>\
**Category:** Governance Discussions\
**Tags:** defi\
**Created:** [May 3, 2022, 6:58pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646 "2022-05-03T18:58:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![myshkin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e480ec/32.png) [@myshkin](https://forum.algorand.co/u/myshkin)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2022, 1:43am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646/32 "2022-05-04T01:43:11Z")

</div>

This seems like a drastic move just to chase last year’s Defillama success stories. I think it will create perverse incentives and make the reward and governance structures unnecessarily complicated and cumbersome. Eventually, all governance proposals will devolve into a scrum for remaining Foundation cash, ruled by the few with the deepest pockets and loudest voices. Please do not go this route.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/evolving-algorand-governance/6646)._
