Evolving Algorand Governance

Thanks for the great discussion on this first day. Answering to @majicman42 because you may appear off track, but I think you are not. The main purpose of this discussion is getting as much as possible what @majicman42 is already doing: users talking directly to developers and entrepreneurs to find ways to bring more and more users to Algorand.

We are a decentralized ecosystem and this is what we all want. This is also why we have a Decentralized Governance, that needs to be more and more decentralized. As long as the Foundation has a role, we commit to help. We all agree here that we want Governors that are ready to bring value to Algorand, and reward them consistently, this was the spirit since the very first Silvio’s blog. Fortunately things have evolved since then and we see from this debate that we have different choices, even if I find that attention to DeFi is largely shared. Finding the right balance is the purpose of the initial questions we posted, and for sure @javier0rosas, we want to see the green line back to the right place.

For those who asked about xGovs, we have been working on that as well and will bring them soon to the discussion.