# Feedback request on proposed Q4 2022 governance measures

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/feedback-request-on-proposed-q4-2022-governance-measures/8236>\
**Category:** Governance Discussions\
**Tags:** community\
**Created:** [November 15, 2022, 10:26am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/feedback-request-on-proposed-q4-2022-governance-measures/8236 "2022-11-15T10:26:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 38

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![krebsmenschen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/3bc359/32.png) [@krebsmenschen](https://forum.algorand.co/u/krebsmenschen)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 8:48pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/feedback-request-on-proposed-q4-2022-governance-measures/8236/38 "2022-11-15T20:48:31Z")

</div>

Honestly, am I the only one, feeling, like the decisions were already made, and this governance is kind of a farce right now.

In the first periods, you always had a choice to “keep it as it is”, but now, the decision IS ALREADY MADE, you can only vote on how much. But the question should be, should it change, and if yes, how?

I AM NOT HAPPY with this direction of governance proposals - not that I agree or disagree with any made proposal above - it’s just, the system itself feels like a scam for me.

How about give more than 2 options, including a keep it as it is?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/feedback-request-on-proposed-q4-2022-governance-measures/8236)._
