Look, I already complained in the previous discussion of the feedback request about the current state of governance.
But the solution to it was not to make it WORSE, but to give more and meaningful options and not take the no option away and literally let decide about Yes in different colors.
Tell me, what is the point of this governance right now?
You have no choice, they are just telling you, what they’re going to do, that’s all.
This is not hyperbole, this is factual correct. And look, I’m not even against the proposal, but why should I read into it, and discern it, if I cannot choose at all?
The community vote should be a discussion, with many different views and opinions, but such a discussion is only useful and not a waste of time, if it can change something. This is not the case right now.
I would even argue, that this is not even a vote and would not live through scrutiny of any court.
If a businessman is asking you if you want to buy a car, and you can choose between paying 4000$ and a banana or 4000$ and an Apple, you had no choice in the first place.
I get it, maybe the foundation has problems, if people downvote their proposals - well, too bad, that is part of being DECENTRALIZED - what they claim to aim for (but diminish compared to the bad, but at least better proposal system as before).
Do multiple Proposal, do community driven proposals and a deep voting system, with more options or just a yes and no option, but with for example Algo amounts to include how much you support what. Or whatever, literally every other system would be better, than that, as this is not voting at all.
Look, part of having the community to choose, is that the community may choose against stuff you want. THIS is being decentralized and if the foundation does not want that (as it seems right now), than they are lying when claiming they want to.
I cannot wrap my mind around, who thought this was a good idea and hope, they will add a C) option, to just say no - not even though, I can say not, but I and everyone else has the option to do so, and hence, has a vote in a governance system.
But well, everyone has different views, and if you like the way, this is handled, I will not convince you otherwise, as the logic is clear, and I cant argue personal opinions.