# Feedback request on proposed Q4 2022 governance measures

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/feedback-request-on-proposed-q4-2022-governance-measures/8236>\
**Category:** Governance Discussions\
**Tags:** community\
**Created:** [November 15, 2022, 10:26am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/feedback-request-on-proposed-q4-2022-governance-measures/8236 "2022-11-15T10:26:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 59

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![d13co](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/d13co/32/3316_2.png) [@d13co](https://forum.algorand.co/u/d13co)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2022, 3:20am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/feedback-request-on-proposed-q4-2022-governance-measures/8236/59 "2022-11-16T03:20:33Z")

</div>

> [@thezec](#):
>
> And before people get to my throat, I know that AlgoFi supports nodes (and it is really a great feature), but do we really want to push all the nodes to one single provider? Does it matter if its name is AlgoFi

AlgoFi supports the keyreg transactions. Where you run your participation node is up to you. So you can participate via a vault and keep your existing node on 2023.

That said, participation nodes should get a gov boost of their own.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/feedback-request-on-proposed-q4-2022-governance-measures/8236)._