For the latest info, read these updates too. Update 2, posted on Dec 3, 2022 Update 1, posted on Nov 26, 2022 — Original post — The Algorand Foundation seeks community feedback on the proposed ballot measures for the upcoming Governance Period 5 voting session, scheduled to open at the end of No…

Hi everyone. I’d like to make a general point regarding not offering a ‘keep status quo’ option. I completely understand that the Foundation wants progression, but like many here I do have an issue with the illusion of choice. How about a compromise – add a third ‘status quo’ option to each propos…

Absolutely in agreement on #1. Whales eating up free rewards to dump on the ecosystem makes 0 sense to incentivize adoption which is sorely needed. Careful (better) vetting of projects for grants should also be done. I.e. if ASAs are getting distributed in these projects then tokenomics should be r…

So far, every vote has been a binary choice so I wonder if that is a limitation. I have also been thinking that ranked choice might be better way to vote and came here to mention it… may be better for progress and with more preference, but I’m not sure ranked choice is technically feasible.

These are all excellent points and I would support these measures.

I agree this is why I think the grant should be weighted towards tried and true teams that have already proven themselves. (NFD, Tinyman, Pact, Folks, Xbacked, etc.)

A reminder at who currently gets the government rewards. [20221117_072530]

I appreciate and largely agree with your alternative proposals and reasons for putting them forward. I want to respond to this particular comment, which gives me concern that a grant program with your suggested “weighting” could become an insiders club that is difficult to break into. I think this…

I definitely understand your point, and I whole heartily think that developers that are new to Algorand should get their fair share. I bring this up not because of wanting to build an insiders club but because the old grant system was full of projects of unproven developers that never delivered. I…

Also, I am very sorry you were treated that way. I for one am very happy that you chose to build here, and if there is anything I can do to help please let me know.

Measure 3 seems pointless. This would only temp raise the floor price of some nft project floors. It also makes the algorand foundation a NFT king maker via purchasing these projects. Can we actually have the xGov write some proposals. I would also like to have governance be where we vote on per…

Feedback request on proposed Q4 2022 governance measures

Governance Discussions

cswenor November 17, 2022, 12:26pm 96

A reminder at who currently gets the government rewards.

Topic		Replies	Views
Governance Period 6 Draft Measures - Community Check In Governance Discussions community	65	5516	May 17, 2023
Feedback requested on proposed Q3 2022 Governance Measures Governance Discussions	205	13586	January 8, 2023
GP8 Measures DRAFT for Community Feedback Governance Measures gp8	42	5555	September 6, 2023
Transparency and clarity on overall community incentives Governance Discussions	4	399	November 27, 2022
Lowering Goverance rewards to fund communtity voted projects Governance Discussions	7	588	May 17, 2024

Feedback request on proposed Q4 2022 governance measures

Related topics