# Gems Q1 2024 NFT Incentive Program

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/gems-q1-2024-nft-incentive-program/10896>\
**Category:** Governance Discussions\
**Tags:** nft-rewards, gp10, distribution-plans\
**Created:** [January 4, 2024, 8:02pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/gems-q1-2024-nft-incentive-program/10896 "2024-01-04T20:02:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wilder](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/wilder/32/2937_2.png) [@Wilder](https://forum.algorand.co/u/Wilder)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2024, 8:02pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/gems-q1-2024-nft-incentive-program/10896/1 "2024-01-04T20:02:36Z")

</div>

Hello Algo community. This is our plan for the next period of NFT incentives!

GP10 Plan: [Gems Q1 2024 NFT Incentive Program](https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSipd8rbpy18TwN0Q5p-hhL8bEBvdzSXeiaZuvpXfooUN-O3u4lx6jFovIH4SffrkQ1lZ53cZ2tGv3W/pub)

We would love feedback around allowing alternative asset volume to be counted towards total platform volume. Any ideas around how this would be implemented, or pros and cons is appreciated.  
Our stance is that there are many reputable tokens with strong communities that should be able to benefit from the incentive program.  
COSG, ALC, Finite for example. $COOP $PEPE $USDC $PRSMS etc.  
We would like to count these tokens volume at their equivalence in Algo if traded.

Finally, we have also suggested outsourcing elements of the decision making process for reward distribution to the GEMS based Governance.  
We think this is a great way to get our community involved and improve the reward review process.  
This would put distribution sign-off of NFT Reward funds to vote of GEMS stakers. This is something we would like to work towards this year if it has your support.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/gems-q1-2024-nft-incentive-program/10896)._
