I dont know who invented this, but it is not true…
First thing for algorand to be decentralized is to put algorand foundation to trash… Only than it can be called decentralized.
One of the fatal things is the domain where list of relay nodes is published. … it is single point of failure… if someone does not pay for the domain, and it expires, whole network will be down
From the list I agree with point 1, 2, and 3… For all acccounts to have the same amount it is quite nonsense…
Also algorand needs to work on the decentralization of all types of nodes… Relay nodes - where everybody search for the point to enter the blockchain and it archvies everything… The participation nodes at the moment absolutely non incentivized and the most important - where application makes requests for transactions. The indexer nodes also non incentivized atm, and very crutial for application development… And KMD nodes - where people can do the ppos work - also non incentivized atm…
It would be so much better if there would be pool of money distributed fairly on the competition manner between each of these pool, and we had a choice to work with any of them…
It would be much more decentralized if you could switch between free participation nodes when the one you have set up has a downtime for example…
Btw, does anybody have list of free public kmd nodes?