Hello all, Why is the application template for xGov proposals so generalised and loose? I see the proposals all have different formats. Why? I think the xgovs and the rest of community are aware by now how 95% of all these proposals are completely useless or redundant, or just simply not effective …

I was also thinking about this. We maybe need a section called ‘Idea validation’ where proposers are required to present evidence of market validation of their idea. Not only would this aid Govs in their decision-making, but also helps proposers gauge the need / refine their proposal.

Hi @ALGOnumberone - thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. We will review the application template for voting session 4 in preparation for a more strict process when we launch the platform in Q3.

We should also consider the recommendations made in this article, I believe this is written by @GhostOfMcAfee [image] Musings on the Pond Special thanks to those who encouraged me to publish this and those who helped with review and feedback — Patrick, Krby, SilentRhetoric… Read…

Retroactive funding removes all the responsibility from builders to make these proposals, which often are completely lacking in real substance, and a total shot in the dark at what sort of value they’ll deliver. While I would debate the points above, I think it should just be nuked in favor of an RP…

@fisherman.algo There is nothing in the xGov rules precluding any builder from submitting a funding request for something that they already built or are building. A few approved grants would fall into the retroactive category. I assume you find xGov so terrible because we are not forbidding non-pu…

Thanks @ALGOnumberone for creating this thread, we are indeed in need for an overhaul of the proposal template. I agree with all your points. We are def working to improve the template. We have two types of grants: build and educate. These need different templates, as they deliverables will vary. W…

Just because it’s possible to get a retroactive grants thru Xgov doesn’t mean it’s substantial, efficient or effective. It’s a lot more than just me saying it sucks. I believe I outlined this in my blog which was in depth on why RPGF works significantly better than w/e Xgov is. I know Xgov is a pil…

No, it is not effective yet, we will get there tho. The pilot is doing its job of uncovering the issues that we need to solve for. Your blog is reflects one opinion, yours. A community is made of many opinions. My opinion is that, nobody is forcing builders to apply for funding through xGov, they …

Ideas to improve the existing funding applications template?

Governance Discussions xGov Proposals Pilot

Richflairstv February 7, 2024, 3:31pm 6

Will the community be able to assist in rule creation?

Topic		Replies	Views
xGov Platform Evolution xGov community , feedback , xgov , xgov-dev	46	2797	February 29, 2024
[xGov][Beta] Testnet Feedback xGov xgov-beta-testnet	15	394	July 31, 2025
xGov Beta Framework, Draft Version Governance Discussions xgov	16	1111	August 28, 2024
An Alternate View on the Future of Algorand xGov Governance Discussions	10	622	July 11, 2024
xGov Voting Session #2 - Retrospective xGov Proposals Pilot xgov , retro	21	1712	December 26, 2023

Ideas to improve the existing funding applications template?

Related topics