# Open-Sourcing the GRAMO Loyalty Platform (xGov Proposal 3500632412)

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/open-sourcing-the-gramo-loyalty-platform-xgov-proposal-3500632412/15245>\
**Category:** xGov Proposals\
**Tags:** xgov-proposals\
**Created:** [April 10, 2026, 4:49am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/open-sourcing-the-gramo-loyalty-platform-xgov-proposal-3500632412/15245 "2026-04-10T04:49:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gramo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/gramo/32/3979_2.png) [@gramo](https://forum.algorand.co/u/gramo)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2026, 7:45pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/open-sourcing-the-gramo-loyalty-platform-xgov-proposal-3500632412/15245/27 "2026-05-08T19:45:13Z")

</div>

The proposal has been resubmitted.

> [@\[Resubmission\] Open-Sourcing the GRAMO Loyalty Platform (xGov Proposal 3548330853)](https://forum.algorand.co/t/resubmission-open-sourcing-the-gramo-loyalty-platform-xgov-proposal-3548330853/15293):
>
> → [xGov proposal](https://xgov.algorand.co/proposal/3548330853) 3548330853 → [Previous discussion](https://forum.algorand.co/t/open-sourcing-the-gramo-loyalty-platform-xgov-proposal-3500632412/15245) (very good additional info in the comments!!!) Why a Resubmission? i) We were evaluated by a xGov committee with half of the members inactive, which made quorum impossible to reach; ii) The note from xGov Council with personal votes was never published, which limited important info for xGovs; iii) We listened the feedback of the community during the discussion of the previous proposal and decided to open-source the repository in advance. These…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/open-sourcing-the-gramo-loyalty-platform-xgov-proposal-3500632412/15245)._
