# Questions for Algorand Foundation June Community All-Hands **URL:** \ **Category:** General\ **Created:** [June 28, 2022, 4:12pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/questions-for-algorand-foundation-june-community-all-hands/7288 "2022-06-28T16:12:46Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![Oppenheimer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Oppenheimer](https://forum.algorand.co/u/Oppenheimer)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2022, 11:27am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/questions-for-algorand-foundation-june-community-all-hands/7288/2 "2022-06-29T11:27:13Z")
1. Some of your questions have been answered here: [https://algorand.foundation/news/xgov-expert-governors-system](https://algorand.foundation/news/xgov-expert-governors-system). And as long as one does not believe that the majority of the Algorand stake is malicious based on the basic assumption that one would not harm oneself, the security assumptions at xGov do not change significantly. Governors are already only a part of the Algorand stakeholders and have to show more commitment. The same applies to xGovs, so that the composition of stakeholders in terms of benign and malignant should not change significantly. A model that shows the opposite would have to demonstrate abstruse mathematics. Especially since, as you said, another barrier is that a large part of the governor’s stake must still agree to the proposals. If xGovs propose a malicious proposal, it should be assumed that this will be largely rejected, otherwise the system would be flawed anyway, so that a malicious proposal would end up costing the creators of the proposal time due to the barrier of the largest stake of the governors. 2. I guess you are talking about the changes to the Foundation’s own proposals. As long as it happens before the vote, I don’t see a problem with it for now, even if it is a bit annoying. Otherwise, the xGov system serves exactly to decentralize proposals. This includes the inviolability of proposals. 3. It would be interesting to hear his opinion. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/questions-for-algorand-foundation-june-community-all-hands/7288)._