The goal is if the teal program executes as true, then it will closeRemainderTo the address that invokes the program. However, when I run it, I get the error: transaction cannot close account to its sender. Here is the teal program - this returns PASS. // Push arg_0 to stack arg_0 // Pop arg_0 fr…

The goal of the closeRemainderTo is to avoid cases where you leave small amount of algos. So, if your account goes below a certain threshold, it will automatically get closed and the remainder would go to the specified account. By using the same account for both “from” and “closeRemainderTo”, it loo…

Ohhhh thank you so much for clarifying that. So just to double check, whenever a program executes and passes, that address tied to the program will pay out all of the balance of the account to the sender of the transaction that invoked the program execution, except for a minimum account balance, wh…

When I run the same program with setting a separate CloseRemainderTo account from the from account or without setting a CloseRemainderTo account, I get this overspend error: 'TransactionPool.Remember: transaction ACZTVICIHDRLRAJK6U6K5QV6PUK6BSDS2KX7VGTYDGLSFYNFPI5Q: overspend (account 3QESO5Z7CXEA4…

I believe you are looking for something similar to the ASC1 Escrow Example recently published. It defines a hashed time lock contract (HTLC) where the TEAL program is the escrow. The program checks the CloseRemainderTo field within the send transaction to determine which clause (hash lock or time lo…

Thanks @ryanRfox . I am still a bit confused. :woman_facepalming: What I am building is https://algoriddle.xyz - It’s a puzzle game on Algorand - I am putting 100 algos in an escrow account and anyone who can solve the puzzle and find the secret key can send it to the account to unlock the escrow ac…

Alright, I understand what you are after. The escrow account will hold some algos and be locked by the hash of the answer to the riddle. Construct a simple hash lock program called riddle.teal : arg 0 len int 32 == arg 0 sha256 byte b64 Q0oWzpC/ICJPtdpY1hPLIZm0E2Ew3ozIGGNbWLg38aQ= == && Compile t…

Actually, I had a poorly formed command above (since corrected), sorry. Also, the last example can be improved. Above, I had the player supplying the net amount to transfer, but performing that math is not needed because we use the -c or --close-to flag which 1) closes the escrow account and 2) send…

Ohhhh your answer made me realize I had the to and from fields flipped. I was sending the 0 amount txn to the escrow account from the sender, but from your above example it looks like it should actually be to the sender from the escrow account. I flipped those fields (I am using Purestake and the J…

Can you confirm the player account is: 3QESO5Z7CXEA4YRSFV6OC4EMTAOA2SC7CQNCDLHT4XLR4PAJ4EGVMPTPQE Can you confirm the escrow account is: 5BQ3QZSMGJ5SG7MND7XPVNTJW6VOETQHXVX7B2QLEXLBDPA6AURGPHYJAE I believe the intention is to close the escrow to the player by revealing the secret. I did not find…

Transaction cannot close account to its sender

dani December 1, 2019, 10:55pm 8

Wow amazing, thank you. How does that last step work? Is there a way to reduce the amount upfront so that the player never has to encounter an error?

Topic		Replies	Views
Closing an escrow contract cannot use CloseRemainerTo	4	550	November 28, 2021
TransactionPool.Remember: transaction ... overspend General	1	903	October 2, 2022
Escrow transaction	1	639	November 12, 2021
Error in transaction	7	733	July 4, 2021
Feedback requested for Onboarding & Complex transaction flow General smart-contracts	5	617	December 12, 2022

Transaction cannot close account to its sender

Related topics