# xGov 166: Simon Says - Experimental ASA trading program - withdrawn

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-166-simon-says-experimental-asa-trading-program-withdrawn/11132>\
**Category:** xGov Proposals Pilot\
**Created:** [January 22, 2024, 11:07am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-166-simon-says-experimental-asa-trading-program-withdrawn/11132 "2024-01-22T11:07:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simonb](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.algorand.co/simonb/32/2818_2.png) [@simonb](https://forum.algorand.co/u/simonb)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2024, 11:04pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-166-simon-says-experimental-asa-trading-program-withdrawn/11132/13 "2024-01-23T23:04:52Z")

</div>

For me it’s a wake-up call that we need “xgov governance” vote session that will help shape the framework.  
The sooner it’s added/implemented the sooner we can put this all behind us.

Calling a proposal bad/trol/etc is subjective, but as long as it’s within the rules you might as well call it legit. just my 5 cents.

ps: we are all active in xgov and share views on this stuff, but for this particular voting session i decided that i’m going to argue for the other side, because somethign needs to change/move and atm nothing is.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-166-simon-says-experimental-asa-trading-program-withdrawn/11132)._