<a name="p-28172-id-169-period-3-title-cosg-amm-liquidity-author-cosmic-champs-madshapes-dev-discussions-to-httpsdiscordggcosmicchamps-company_name-cosmic-champs-international-limited-category-community-focus_area-user-onboarding-open_source-no-amount_requested-10000-status-final-1" class="anchor" href="#p-28172-id-169-period-3-title-cosg-amm-liquidity-author-cosmic-champs-madshapes-dev-discussions-to-httpsdiscordggcosmicchamps-company_name-cosmic-champs-international-limited-category-community-focus_area-user-onboarding-open_source-no-amount_requested-10000-status-final-1" aria-label="Heading link"> id: 169 period: 3 title: COSG AMM liquidity author: Cosmic Champs (@madshapes-dev) discussions-to: Cosmic Champs company_name: Cosmic Champs International Limited category: Community focus_area: User Onboarding open_source: No amount_requested: 10000 status: Final Abstract $COSG token is …

So in short, this is a grant to purchase Coop, Akita, and ALC? What happens to awarded funds after the 3 month window?

xGov is not for liquidity proposals, especially when its not AF holding the liquidity and the option for the ALGOs to be returned after some time. On top, IF liquidity proposals were a thing they would have to be of the form ALGO-TOKENXYZ where ALGO is provided through the proposal and TOKENXYZ by t…

I storngly disagree with this statement, xgov granted 32k algo for LP to the vote coin in previous period (despites overly negative public response) and there were no rules to exclude it this period. We were all very vocal about this, but if no changes were made, to prevent it after a lot of feedbac…

in short this is a jab at the xgov system, that refuses to evolve to prevent requests like this, despites many very vocal people asking for the change. Don’t hate the player, hate the game

and that one shouldnt have passed either

AF has created the rules, they have reviewed the proposals before voting session, enough of expert governors decided they want to support this proposal. Lets see how all similar proposals in this voting session will go. If enough experts will pass all of them, it will be signal that it is desired a…

no it wont be a signal that people want since you are voting for it and abuse that people vote for everything

no, we live and die by xgov votes - if xgovs support it, so do i. And since it wasn’t voted on to be prevented in this period, i have no complaints - thus the xgov-169 proposal was born.

xGov-169: COSG AMM liquidity

Governance Discussions xGov Proposals Pilot

D4O January 24, 2024, 4:06pm 12

Topic		Replies	Views
xGov Liquidity Deployment, Request for Feedback Governance Discussions	40	879	February 2, 2024
xGov-23 Open AMM xGov Proposals Pilot voting-session-1	20	3197	August 12, 2023
xGov prop. 163 - Biatec AMM - Milestone 3 xGov Proposals Pilot	14	466	February 11, 2024
xGov Proposal -150 - Cross-Chain community promotion and collaberation xGov Proposals Pilot xgov , voting-session-3	21	806	February 7, 2024
xGov 166: Simon Says - Experimental ASA trading program - withdrawn xGov Proposals Pilot	14	739	January 25, 2024

xGov-169: COSG AMM liquidity

Related topics