[xGov-3240198097] ASA Stats Permission dApp

The above is precisely the part you should emphasize as a benefit that the community and ecosystem can gain from the outcomes within the scope of this proposal. These are the points that voters with voting rights will particularly focus on when making their decisions.

If you want to use the code itself as a reference, the number of Stars, Watches, or Forks could serve as helpful quantitative indicators. If no such numbers exist, you would submit it as is. Without numerical data, some voters might question whether it has truly provided any benefit.

The definition of “Retroactive” is provided in the xGov GitHub documentation. Please refer to the link below.

Funding Types
The Proposals have two different funding types:

Retroactive

Claim: “I have done X, which has benefited the Algorand ecosystem because of Y metrics, I would like to receive Z as compensation for the work”.

Positive outcome: funding is immediately disbursed if the Proposal is approved by the xGov Committee vote, and the xGov Council does not apply a veto according to the terms and conditions.

Proactive (NOT AVAILABLE YET)

Claim: “I want to do X, it has the potential Y for the Algorand ecosystem, I would like to receive Z staggered behind these milestones”.

Positive outcome: funding will be disbursed if the Proposal is approved by the xGov Committee vote, after milestone reviews from the xGov Council, and if the xGov Council does not apply a veto according to terms and conditions.

1 Like