# xGov# 3247943209: Algorand Foundation Wallet Watcher Twitter Account @AFWalletWatcher **URL:** \ **Category:** xGov Proposals\ **Created:** [October 6, 2025, 11:58pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-3247943209-algorand-foundation-wallet-watcher-twitter-account-afwalletwatcher/14983 "2025-10-06T23:58:44Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 12
**Author:** ![Coinbox](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ed8c4c/32.png) [@Coinbox](https://forum.algorand.co/u/Coinbox)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2025, 12:16pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-3247943209-algorand-foundation-wallet-watcher-twitter-account-afwalletwatcher/14983/12 "2025-11-11T12:16:53Z")
> [@funk](#): > > Hi Leo, > > I did see that, I just don’t agree with the evaluation of the value. Please don’t take it personally - I know you’re a more talented developer than these python scripts exemplify. > > It’s easy to only leave positive feedback on the proposals you like, but that’s not very helpful for xGovs looking for guidance. Hey Leo, I get what you’re saying. I saw your point, I just have a different view on the valuation itself. Nothing personal at all. I know you’re a stronger developer than what those quick Python examples might suggest. And honestly, giving only positive feedback doesn’t really help xGovs make informed decisions. Balanced critique is part of the process, even when we disagree. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-3247943209-algorand-foundation-wallet-watcher-twitter-account-afwalletwatcher/14983)._