Thank you to all the candidates in the first xGov council election. This is a pivotal time for our community as we start evolving how we approach decentralized decision-making. As we start this journey, the xGov Council powers are still very limited in scope, with the foundation retaining control o…

The list of eligible LP tokens is built exactly as in the previous periods: all LPs which have deposited more than 10k Algo at a particular snapshot (Block 51208764 for GP15). This Period we are going to include also all the LSTs (xAlgo, tAlgo, mAlgo, cAlgo) as well as all myth finance dualstake tok…

[image] trekianov: xAlgo, tAlgo, mAlgo, cAlgo is there reason why i dont see aAlgo in the list?

The reason is that Vestige API, used to collect all the relevant data, is not tracking it, but since it follows the same logic of the other LSTs we are going to include also aAlgo, thanks for pointing this out.

There is a link error among the candidates for Governance Period 15, so I’d like to report it. Measure #19 Wilder Stubbs Read Wilder’s full application (PR-02) before voting ↑ The correct URL is here: ↓ https://github.com/algorandfoundation/xGov/blob/main/Council/xgov_council-2.md Here is th…

Thanks for catching this @yazyyyyyyy.algo . The link URL was missing. It’s been updated.

[image] simonb: 1:1 algo backed and are participatin Awesome, gonna vote with xAlgo!

@Adri I have a serious concern about this: Why are the candidates ordered by Last Name on the Governance Period 15 Voting Session rather than order of applications as listed on here? Expecting voters to review 22 detailed candidate applications is a BIG ASK and I would HATE for candidates to not …

I think it’s a good point. And yeah, I think it’s better to sort candidates either by random or by their number, not their surname.

I agree with this. There’s real value in taking swift action. However, making changes at this point would only cause more confusion, so I think we have no choice but to proceed as is. I hope that next time, clear rules will be set in advance for situations like this.

It’s also the inconsistency… I expected the order on Voting Session to be the same as it’s been appeared on Github, or on the Algorand Forum (i.e. this thread). Not sure why the sudden change? Algorand Foundation must know that ballot order actually matters ALOT right?

xGov Council Election 2025

Governance Discussions xGov Council

splotchy1735 July 1, 2025, 9:03am 26

Awesome, gonna vote with xAlgo!

Topic		Replies	Views
The xGov Council: Shaping the future of xGov xGov Council feedback , xgov , arc	50	2053	March 18, 2025
[xGov][Community meeting][New Version][2024/04/04] Governance Discussions arc34	57	2412	May 30, 2024
An Alternate View on the Future of Algorand xGov Governance Discussions	10	619	July 11, 2024
Thoughts after attending Decipher's Governance Roundtable on xGovs & ARC-33 Proposal Governance Discussions	12	1106	December 26, 2022
xGov Voting Session #2 - Retrospective xGov Proposals Pilot xgov , retro	21	1712	December 26, 2023

xGov Council Election 2025

Related topics