# xGov Platform Evolution

**URL:** <https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-platform-evolution/11490>\
**Category:** xGov\
**Tags:** community, feedback, xgov, xgov-dev\
**Created:** [February 23, 2024, 10:53am UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-platform-evolution/11490 "2024-02-23T10:53:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Imod87](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Imod87](https://forum.algorand.co/u/Imod87)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2024, 5:31pm UTC](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-platform-evolution/11490/16 "2024-02-23T17:31:12Z")

</div>

I have no problem with major strategic funding from the Foundation to e.g. Hesab Pay & friends. Mostly because of completely different due diligence. When it comes to the proactive governance funding though, I would a priori support @fisherman.algo’s idea of a “crowdfunding DAO” over the one presented. It would be a fitting idea for a game-theoretical, decentralised and permissionless system. It would in my mind at least remedy some of the faults of the current xGov system and still allow for targeted subsidies from the Foundation.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.algorand.co/t/xgov-platform-evolution/11490)._