I think that a lot of people are entering governance just for rewards and not because they want to vote on questions.
I also think that big exchanges, like coinbase and binance etc, are holding a lot of Algo and putting it in governance where they don’t really have the right to vote on behalf of those coins as they haven’t polled their users.
For both these reasons I think there should be an option C: Abstain from the vote and just be given rewards for participation.
This will remove these noisy, and very large, signals from the questions allowing us to find out what active and engaged governors think while also rewarding participation and involvement in the system.
I also think if a very large number of participants choose option C: Abstain, then that will show that governance could do with some deeper reforms.
Would love to hear any and all feedback. Do you agree or disagree? Does this make sense to do? Are there problems and weaknesses to this proposal?
It seems pretty easy to implement as well as useful to the system.
