Evening @uhudo — just as a courtesy so I don’t leave you hanging on this thread and the other two — I know it has been some time since you asked for some additional info; I want to address your comments but would like to get the thoughts of @ulrik and @Allan before I respond since these proposals are team efforts. Hope you don’t mind, we should finally be able to sit down and discuss together tomorrow and respond. Thanks for your patience!
Thanks for these modifications. Now the proposal seems more in line with T&Cs.
Would you mind providing some metrics on the usage these two smart contracts have seen?
Without these, it is difficult to judge if the claimed unique fee structure provided sufficient benefit w.r.t. the ask, especially if the work is not open-sourced in advance.
Regarding open-sourcing, could you clarify which parts are already open-sourced and where are they accessible?
Oh I’d have to find the old App ID’s and manually run analytics, I made need a day or two for that.
Edit: By existing open-sourced content I mean on Algorand generally, I know they’re using it for their agents / llms (eg; the one Gabe from DevRel created recently)
There were a total of 78 pools created, this was a global state so we could easily keep track of this. If you need other analytics please let me know what you’re looking for specifically — thank you.
@uhudo I discussed with team and the consensus is we just open-source the Gainify contracts, Algofun Shares System, and AVM Email contracts — they are minimally documented and will contain no test files, frontend codebase, or any other supplementary files. We understand the risk of blindly accepting proposal TnC for conditional open-sourcing right now and feel its the least we could do to make your lives easier. We have uploaded Gainify contracts so far, we will add AVM Email & Algofun Shares System by tomorrow.
About the formalities, the currently shared repo still does not meet T&Cs.
An open-source license is missing and the repo hasn’t been added to Electric Capital.
I also think joining again all proposals in the same repo adds back the confusion about the proposals.
Just sharing the contracts without the accompanying tests and documentation, i.e. a partial proposal, IMO still doesn’t meet T&Cs (while I know some other xGov Council members are more lenient on these points than me).
On the content side, I skimmed the shared Gainify Contracts.
IMO they don’t provide sufficient novelty and/or quality of execution w.r.t. to the ask.
I’d advise you to focus only on one proposal first, not multiple simultaneously. IMO the AVM Email proposal has the highest chances of passing.
Ok — we will place Algofun Shares System & Gainify proposals on hold — then for AVM Email, fully open-source, add license, document, and add repo to Electric capital. ~