xGov# 3247943209: Algorand Foundation Wallet Watcher Twitter Account @AFWalletWatcher

Link to Proposal:

xGov

The @AFWalletWatcher account has generated 152K impressions and 1.3K “Likes” on X since inception on May 10th 2025 (5 months since deployment).

The program behind the AFWalletWatcher account monitors 57 wallets officially labeled and owned by the foundation and tweets when any on-chain transactions are executed that involve them, including:

• 5 Treasury Addresses
• 30 Ecosystem Support Addresses
• 2 Market Operations Addresses **
• 2 Miscellaneous Addresses
• 6 Unlabeled Foundation Wallets

The program is also capable of compiling a summary of the foundation’s Algorand holdings.

The @AFWalletWatcher has brought attention to internal movements of Algorand funds across accounts that has triggered dialogues I feel are quite important. Although we are provided transparency reports per quarter I, and some others, feel there is more room for disclosure of expenditures, overhead and general spending habits.

The account keeps the community informed of large internal movements, and sometimes catches interesting new partnerships, like the initial Midas Treasury Bill Token opt-in.

The inherent value is in its actual execution, consistency, maintenance and contributions to the ecosystem; the logic behind the @AFWalletWatcher is in no way especially complex for a well-seasoned developer.

Any code used for the @AFWalletWatcher account is present here: GitHub - atsoc1993/AF-Wallet-Watcher: Logic behind the @AFWalletWatcher account on X

Thanks for this proposal Leo!

Would you mind adding some documentation to the repo? E.g. what the project does and how to run it.
Part of xGov proposal requirements is that there is approrpiate documentation available.

Of course! Ill update with another reply once done.

All set @uhudo !

AF-Wallet-Watcher/README.md at main · atsoc1993/AF-Wallet-Watcher

That’s detailed, great!

I feel the ask is high given the amount and lack of complexity of the code here.

Hi @funk!

Not sure if you saw the end portion here:

“The inherent value is in its actual execution, consistency, maintenance and contributions to the ecosystem; the logic behind the @AFWalletWatcher is in no way especially complex for a well-seasoned developer.

where can i find the amount of algo asked?

It’s around $4,600 currently @deathproof, or 25,000 Algo.

The Algo amount requested is in the proposal linked at the top.

This one: Algorand Foundation Wallet Watcher Twitter Account @AFWalletWatcher | xGov

Hi Leo,

I did see that, I just don’t agree with the evaluation of the value. Please don’t take it personally - I know you’re a more talented developer than these python scripts exemplify.

It’s easy to only leave positive feedback on the proposals you like, but that’s not very helpful for xGovs looking for guidance.

I fully understand @funk!

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with voicing your honest opinion.

You are correct that this proposal should hold no leverage via relationships or past works, it should be valued on its own, with 0 bias, by not only community sentiment but also its complexity.

On this point I agree with you that it is not especially complex. I could argue that it requires my attention from time to time but that would not change the base code’s conciseness.

I appreciate your feedback, and those of anyone else who has taken the time to analyze and vote on the proposal!

Hey Leo, I get what you’re saying. I saw your point, I just have a different view on the valuation itself. Nothing personal at all. I know you’re a stronger developer than what those quick Python examples might suggest. And honestly, giving only positive feedback doesn’t really help xGovs make informed decisions. Balanced critique is part of the process, even when we disagree.

At a loss for words, I didn’t quite understand @funk earlier but you have really cleared things up.

Thanks @Coinbox

Hey @Atsoc1993 I sent you a message with a special feedback request It’s really from me.